Sisterhood, Inc.

Good Title, Anyway.

The current image has no alternative text. The file name is: sisterhood.jpg

Spoilers

I almost liked this. There was some good writing in there and some funny quips. It started out pretty well, but unfortunately the three main women characters turned out to be too much of a mess. Things started to look up a little over half way through and I started to hope that as least two of them were starting to turn things around. But no, our main protagonist gets herself into so much trouble with everyone else in the movie that they hated her for awhile and I couldn’t blame them. She did bad. The secondary lead backslides from all of the progress she had made to get her life on the right track and I threw up my hands. Of course the big crisis results in lessons learned and a happy ending for all but by that time it was too late after grinding my teeth through the whole movie.

Rachel Leigh Cook plays Megan, who is the founder and CEO of her own tech company based on a scheduling app she created. In the first scene she is ousted by the board of directors due to a downturn in their stock during the last 3 quarters. We are to understand this was an unfair and unwise move on their part especially since she is to be replaced by the daughter of the chairman of the board. At first I was skeptical of how realistic this scenario was. How could Megan allow herself to be placed in the position of being fired from her own company? But a quick Google search taught me that this is quite common. In fact, it is the usual fate of the founders of companies. Did you know that Elon Musk was fired from PayPal? And who founded Tesla? No, not Elon Musk. It was Martin Eberhard, who was also fired from his own company to make way for you know who. What was unrealistic about Megan’s firing was how shocked and surprised she was. But I digress.

Megan does not know who she is or what to do with herself without her company, so when her screw-up of a little sister asks Megan to help her get her life on the right track she recognizes that this is something she can really sink her teeth into. Or, as her assistant Chris puts it, “Really sink your claws into, shred into pieces and eat the beating heart out of.” She conceives a plan to treat her sister’s makeover like her sister is a struggling company to be turned around. She appoints  a board of directors, with herself the chairman, and together they will change Izzy’s life trajectory in personal appearance and branding, love, and career path. Izzy wants her hair to look like the shampoo commercials and to be able to “afford stuff.” All of “The Board” are friends and connections except one guy, who is to be the independent director to ensure everything stays on track . He is a professor and chair of the psychology department of a local college. The only reason he gives for applying to donate his time and expertise to such an off the wall project is that it is so off the wall as to be intriguing and he has a light schedule this semester. He looks like a young Clive Owen, seems to have it all together, and is Megan’s love interest. I liked him. He gives good advice to Megan throughout which she ignores. In fact, I liked all of the characters except the main ones: the two sisters and their mother.

Megan is a workaholic with no time for her family or a personal life. This is hardly unusual for a Hallmark Heroine who has to learn balance, the importance of family, and find love in 89 minutes. That plot is a Hallmark mainstay.  But Megan treats her mother and sister with contempt, clearly looking down on them and lets her disapproval shine through with every word and interaction.  When she is not rolling her eyes, she looks like she is about to. But then, she acts all sorry for herself at being excluded from the tight bond between the two other women. But when they attempt to include her, she rejects them and wants no part of it. So I had a hard time feeling any sympathy for her despite her dead Daddy issues. When she gets her sister under her thumb thanks to her project, her dictatorial ways did nothing to soften my feelings toward her. Daniella Monet, who played Izzy, brought as much charm and likability to her role as she could. She did a great job with a very troubling character. Almost 30-year-old Izzy  spends her life going to festivals, partying, and dating useless men. She spends the money she does earn with her dead end job foolishly. She does not still live at home, but her lifestyle is subsidized by her indulgent mother and her reluctant step-father.  We first meet her delivering pizza. Our first impression is of her reaching into the top delivery box and tearing off a chunk with her bare hand and stuffing it in her mouth. Since this was despite a warning from her boss not to sample the merchandise we can assume this is not an isolated incident. I found it very difficult to look at her with a kind eye after that. And the last of the terrible trio is the mother. As Megan says, Izzy and Lois are codependent. Lois is a bad mother, treating her like a best friend rather than a parent. She enables her in all of her foolish behavior, pays her bills, and even seems to resent Izzy’s respectable new job in an art gallery because it takes away from their fun times together.  To top it all off she puts a tracker on Izzy’s phone without her knowledge.

They’re not all bad. All three demonstrated some charm and redeeming characteristics here and there. Like last Saturday’s movie, I appreciated the big city setting and city concerns rather than being plunked down in the middle of farms, small towns, and festivals for a change. The rest of the cast was unobjectionable to very good.

By the end, Megan finally mends her relationships with everyone she needs to including the handsome professor.  Izzy gets her life together in about two seconds at the end, out of nowhere, does it her way, and by herself (!). And Mom comes to an understanding with both of her two daughters. On the professional front, Megan starts a new business with a product that was lurking in the background all the time, and we have the satisfaction of knowing that her old company is tanking without her. Always a big “Yay!”

Rating: 6 out of 10.

Rescuing Christmas

Cute as the Dickens

This was just as delightful as I remember it being when I saw it last December on the Hallmark Now channel (free trial subscription). I remember thinking that it was one of the best Christmas movies of the season and wondered why it wasn’t on their network Countdown to Christmas 2023. I didn’t review it then because of that and because there are just so many reviews one can do in a week at the busiest time of the year. So it was no hardship to look at it again last night.

Erin (Rachel Leigh Cook) is somewhat of a Christmas scrooge. She only appreciates Christmas for the joy it gives others, particularly her own niece and nephew. She is picked at random for “Operation: Wish” conceived by two of Santa’s elves, Chuck and Debbie, to help humankind rediscover its Christmas spirit which has been lost in the wake of such crimes against humanity like social media and macaroni and cheese ice cream. She is driven to distraction by the two elves incessant emails to claim her last wish (the first two were for her Mom’s Christmas cookies and her old boyfriend to to come back and give her the credit she deserves for his new found success (long and entertaining story: She ends up throwing the asshole out of the house). Finally in frustration and a little scared because her two previous wishes came true by coincidence, she wishes for Christmas to disappear. When it does, she soon realizes her mistake and spends the rest of the movie trying to bring Christmas back with the help of the love interest, Sam, played by Sam Page. He did not endear himself to Erin at first when he showed up for their blind date in Reindeer Antlers. Of course now that Erin has wished that there is no such thing as Christmas and never was, his love for the holiday is not an issue. But yet, despite his initial incredulity over what she is blathering on about, he helps and supports her because he really really likes her. We know it’s true love when she calls him to bail her out of jail.  It was sweet and romantic.

Erin’s attempts to explain Christmas and how to celebrate it to everyone are very funny and thought provoking. A tree in the house? Pantyhose full of rocks? And who was this Mary Krismas again? She sets about trying to recreate it for her loved ones, Sam, and then the whole town. It is gold mine of visual humor. Red and Green aren’t a thing now that Christmas never was, so Erin has to make due with pink and chartreuse. When she sends her parents out to purchase the usual Christmas paraphernalia, they come back with leftover Halloween decorations,  pink feather boas, Hawaiian Leis, tennis balls, and beach balls (“You said to get ornaments like brightly colored balls!”). Is christmas even possible without twinkle lights? Will a fox do for a yard ornament? Because reindeer? Really?

Everyone who had a part in this movie was wonderful, but I particularly loved the quirky performances of Patrick O’Brien and  Bailey Stender who played Chuck and Debbie, the two elves responsible for the whole fustercluck who were eager to help Erin but had to do so with only the most discreet use of Christmas Magic.  The writers made the decision to keep religion and spirituality out of this movie entirely. And I see why they did that. But to me, it brought this one down just a bit. I would have appreciated even a cursory nod to the original reason for Christmas, since this was what the movie was kind of about. It was kind of an elephant in the room. Despite that, with Santa’s help, all ends happily with Erin finally realizing she loved Christmas for the joy it gave her, not just her loved ones, and satisfactorily paired up with Sam. (“Is romance always part of Christmas?”, he asked. “Of course, whole channels were devoted to it.”) In the end, even Chuck and Debbie got their wish and no longer had to deal with humans again.

Rating: 9.5 out of 10.

‘Tis the Season to be Merry

“I Just Want Someone to Tell Me Not to go”

**Spoilers**

I loved Rachel Leigh Cook and Travis Van Winkle in this. They really did have excellent chemistry. The script is witty and intelligent and the acting by all concerned was top-notch as well. Merry is a social media influencer with over 3 million followers who specializes in relationships. She is about to publish her first book using her relationship with her fiancé Dale as proof that her rules for a successful relationship really work. Unfortunately, her fiancé does not exist. She just daydreamed him up. She tries to break the news to her publisher, Sonia, but keeps getting interrupted. She decides to accompany her best friend and editor, Darlene, to Vermont to escape awkward questions and figure out what to do.

Merry is concerned that Darlene’s brother Adam might be there, but Darlene reassures her. He does good works for people in third-world countries but he is not a missionary. We get no details as to why the concern but assume there was some kind of flirtation or relationship that didn’t go well. Well, Adam does show up and shows up in her bed, which results in a nice bit of physical comedy. Merry gets involved with all of the holiday activities which throw her and Adam together. Meanwhile, Darlene really likes a local boy, James, who seems to really like Merry. Oops. Meanwhile, Sonia finds out Dale does not exist and comes to Vermont after her. Merry has to rewrite her book and come up with the outline by Christmas. Sonia’s a tough cookie, but we see another side of her when she meets the local boy’s father, a fellow Clemson graduate(!) So we have 3 romances going. There is a side story about Adam and Darlene’s parents selling their land and business which had been in the family for 3 generations. Adam has actually come home to settle down at last and is full of plans for the family business that he expects to take over after his parents retire. They didn’t think it necessary to give the kids a heads up pretty much yanking the rug out from under them. Darlene doesn’t care, but Adam is hurt and angry and he pulls no punches with his parents. I love that he didn’t just put on a brave and noble face. They deserve to feel bad. Honestly, I kind of hated them. Of course, they have a right to sell, but without even letting their kids know what their plans were? It had been handed down through 3 generations!

Well, Merry finds her inspiration from her romance with Adam (There are No Rules to a Successful Relationship-must be a short book). She rushes her outline to Sonia at the Airport where she sees Adam, leaving for Asia, since there is nothing for him anymore in Vermont. She yells at him “Don’t Go!” and he doesn’t-The End.

Rating: 7 out of 10.

December 27, 2021

Summer in the Vineyard

Cashing in on a Better than Usual Original. Unfortunately It’s Nothing but a Pale Imitation

A pale sequel to the very good Autumn in the Vineyard. The same beautiful landscapes without any of the interesting suspenseful plot points and multidimensional characters of the original. Frankie and Nate are trying to keep their new venture afloat but have conflicting management styles and suffer from a lack of communication. At the end they learn to work together. Thanks to a miracle at the end their vineyard is saved. Yawn. **4 out of 10 stars**

Rating: 4 out of 10.

August 22, 2017

Autumn in the Vineyard

Cheers!

One of the better productions in a long time. Set in beautiful wine country, the countryside was gorgeous. Rachel Leigh Cook makes a great Hallmark heroine and her chemistry with the love interest was very good. It started out with some good conflict with her father who not only took her for granted but figuratively slapped her in the face by denying her her rightful place in his business. She rightly struck out on her own by buying her own vineyard, much to his dismay. I love a good comeuppance story. The plot moved on nicely, forcing the h/h to co-manage their vineyard which was somehow sold to both of them at the same time. They had a history and a rivalry already, which added interest to their romance and the development of their relationship. There was a little hint of a secondary romance of an older couple (the hero and heroine’s parents and the heads of competing vineyards.) and a younger couple. There were plenty of interesting secondary characters to keep things moving along. I really like the actress who played the friend. (Ali Leibert) And it was interesting that his family was kind of sketchy. They avoided a real T.V. remote throwing potential plot twist by avoiding the trap of having her save her dad from bankruptcy by giving up her own successful venture. That would have been a terrible message to send. So thank-you. **8 out of 10 stars**

Rating: 8 out of 10.

October 11, 2016